Has Microsoft found its groove?

Microsoft has recently held a big hardware event and it is clear that the claims by the talking heads in the technology media about Microsoft hardware division is only an inspiration to third parties is well and truly wrong. Microsoft is in the hardware and they’re in there to make money by developing the sorts of products that get people excited and inspired, they aren’t there to compete against the bargain basement products put out by high volume OEMs – they’re setting themselves up as the Apple of the Windows world then leaving the sub NZ$1000 market to Dell, Lenovo and HP to fight over.

What got my really excited were the Surface Duo and Surface Neo for different reasons. The Surface Duo being a Android based device could finally be the sort of device that, when coupled with Microsoft’s own support policy, will mean that upgrades and updates will be pushed out with the same sense of urgency that Microsoft do with Windows which would be a huge change in the Android world. At the moment you’ve got the likes of Samsung sometimes being 2-3 months behind Google’s security updates where security updates for their latest phones (at least in New Zealand) don’t come out until the end of the very month they were released by Google to its own phones.

The Surface Neo is interesting not necessarily because of the hardware, although the hardware is awesome, but rather because of the operating system that it uses which Microsoft labels Windows 10X. The attraction to me isn’t just the new shell that is present but also the fact that there is win32 support but it uses container technology which, in my book, is something that is desperately needed given the number of third party software titles with poorly written installer can hose an otherwise pristine Windows installation into a mess – the same reason why I got excited at the idea of win32 applications being in the store due to Project Centennial putting that line of demarcation between the operating system and the applications that are installed so that a badly written installer cannot hose Windows or when you uninstall a particular software title there aren’t hundreds of bits and pieces left over because the uninstaller is in worse shape than the installer.

Keeping in mind that all of this won’t be shipping until next year in December 2020 so it leaves me wondering whether part of this will involve the shell being very much built upon the work being done with WinUI 3.x and 4.x so I could imagine Windows 10X being made available to OEMs but long term I don’t see Microsoft wanting to support multiple branches. Long term I could see Windows 10X becoming mainstream then eventually being pushed out to enterprise customers but long story short the future is a Windows NT Core with two main frameworks, .NET and Unified Windows Platform, with legacy win32 libraries hanging around for backwards compatibility and those applications that need such backwards compatibility will be running inside a container. If Microsoft can nail this all down then the opportunity for Windows and Microsoft beyond the PC looks bright.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.