After getting through Sunday night and all of Monday, I thought there was a meeting but then I realised the meeting wasn’t until 2 March but I guess it wasn’t all bad because I double checked before heading to the venue. For lunch I had some pumpkin soup along with some fresh garlic bread and for a small desert I had some boysenberries. The weather has improved and looking out for the 7 day forecast on the Metservice website it appears things are getting back to normal but given how things can change at a moments notice I wouldn’t get too comfortable.
Around where I live we didn’t have a massive amount of flooding other than around 4 inches of flooding in the drive way but apart from that the road I live on and the road my road connects to wasn’t flooded. Regarding other areas, there are a few streets close to where I live where the outcome has been pretty bad due to a stream overflowing and the water getting up to the height of the door handle on a sedan car. I haven’t gone exploring out there because I think the last think those doing recovery work want is someone rubbernecking and causing more problems. Hopefully things will get back normal by around Wednesday when I head back into the office for a couple of days.
The electricity went off just after midnight so I checked out Wellington Electricity to see what the repair schedule is – at the time I saw the repair time being 17 February at 6:00 but I had incorrectly read it as 6pm when it was 6am. The whole of the Hutt Valley had gone offline so I wasn’t expecting it to be fixed that soon especially one considers how bad the weather was and if the outage was caused by trees falling etc it doesn’t make much sense to do any repairs until after the the weather had improved.
I was watching a video debunking the idea that young people are going back to the church:
It reminds me of the book ‘The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics’ that we’re going through a process of not only secularisation but also desecularisation. What do I mean by that? as a society we’re secularising in terms of becoming less religious or at least affiliated with religious institutions while those who are remaining religious are being more intense in their religiosity. The other part of the equation is the rate of retention over the medium and long term – it is one thing to get converts, the honeymoon period of doing something new but the question is whether it can be sustained over the long term or does it end up being like the list of other things they got a sudden interest in and years later have moved on from.
Regarding the secularisation process, the liberal main line denominations have been hit particularly well over the years and the usual refrain I see on YouTube from the more conservative wing of their denomination is the claim that it is liberalism that has caused it. Like a lot of things in life I would say that there is an element of truth but you’re just as likely to lose members if your church simply becomes a force of reactionary religiosity. The problem with liberalism isn’t liberalism per se but if you aren’t willing to have clearly defined borders of where the limits are then the problem is that with no clearly defined borders then what do you actually believe in? I’m certainly not a fan of the slippery slop argument but your denomination gets to the point that you’re saying that you’re still part of the domination even when your beliefs clearly contradict the core elements of the religion then what do you actually stand for?
If at the end of the day you make the tent so broad that almost anyone and anything fits underneath it then eventually the whole thing will collapse in on itself and you’ll no longer be able to clearly define what makes your particular domination unique from other dominations or the non-religious. When I am talking about the the ability to define oneself I am referring to the core fundamental theological beliefs – sure, around the edges you may have differences regarding whether something is a sin or how to understand the organisation of a church by learning the lessons the past, but that the centre there has to something there or otherwise you run the risk that there is nothing at the core of your denomination’s beliefs, that the core is hollowed out then at which point you may as well call yourself a social club that meets up every Sunday to sing some songs and randomly recite random passages out of new favourite book that parishioners choose every week.
